abrogation 音标拼音: [
, æbrəg'eʃən]
n . 废除,取消
废除,取消
abrogation n 1 :
the act of abrogating ;
an official or legal cancellation [
synonym : {
abrogation }, {
repeal }, {
annulment }]
Abrogation \
Ab `
ro *
ga "
tion \,
n . [
L .
abrogatio ,
fr .
abrogare :
cf .
F .
abrogation .]
The act of abrogating ;
repeal by authority . --
Hume .
[
1913 Webster ]
58 Moby Thesaurus words for "
abrogation ":
abjuration ,
abjurement ,
abolishment ,
abolition ,
absolute contradiction ,
annulment ,
cancel ,
canceling ,
cancellation ,
cassation ,
contradiction ,
contrary assertion ,
contravention ,
controversion ,
countering ,
countermand ,
counterorder ,
crossing ,
defeasance ,
denial ,
disaffirmation ,
disallowance ,
disavowal ,
disclaimer ,
disclamation ,
disownment ,
disproof ,
forswearing ,
gainsaying ,
impugnment ,
invalidation ,
nullification ,
recall ,
recantation ,
refutation ,
renege ,
renunciation ,
repeal ,
repudiation ,
rescinding ,
rescindment ,
rescission ,
retractation ,
retraction ,
reversal ,
revocation ,
revoke ,
revokement ,
setting aside ,
suspension ,
vacation ,
vacatur ,
voidance ,
voiding ,
waiver ,
waiving ,
withdrawal ,
write -
off ABROGATION ,
in the civil law ,
legislation .
The destruction or annulling of a former law ,
by an act of the legislative power ,
or by usage .
A law may be abrogated or only derogated from ;
it is abrogated when it is totally annulled ;
it is derogated from when only a part is abrogated :
derogatur legi ,
cum pars detrahitur ;
abrogatur legi ,
cum prorsus tollitur .
Dig lib ..
50 ,
t .
17 ,
1 ,
102 .
Lex rogatur dum fertur ;
abrogatur dum tollitur ;
derogatur eidem dum quoddam ejus caput aboletuer ;
subrogatur dum aliquid ei adjicitur ;
abrogatur denique ,
quoties aliquid in ea mutatur .
Dupin ,
Proleg .
Juris ,
Art .
iv .
2 .
Abrogation is express or implied ;
it is express when it ,
is literally pronounced by the new law ,
either in general terms ,
as when a final clause abrogates or repeals all laws contrary to the provisions of the new one ,
or in particular terms ,
as when it abrogates certain preceding laws which are named .
3 .
Abrogation is implied when the new law contains provisions which are positively ,
contrary to the former laws ,
without expressly abrogating such laws :
for it is a posteriora derogant prioribus .
3 N .
S .
190 ;
10 M .
R .
172 .
560 .
It is also implied when the order of things for which the law had been made no longer exists ,
and hence the motives which had caused its enactment have ceased to operate ;
ratione legis omnino cessante cessat lex .
Toullier ,
Droit Civil Francais ,
tit .
prel .
Sec .
11 ,
n .
151 .
Merlin ,
mot Abrogation .
安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!
中文字典英文字典工具:
复制到剪贴板
英文字典中文字典相关资料:
知乎 - 有问题,就会有答案 知乎,中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台,于 2011 年 1 月正式上线,以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解,找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。
1-1+1-1+1-1+1. . . 这个无穷数列的值是什么?如何证明? - 知乎 知乎,中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台,于 2011 年 1 月正式上线,以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解,找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。
Binomial expansion of $ (1-x)^n$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange Binomial expansion of $ (1-x)^n$ Ask Question Asked 11 years, 7 months ago Modified 5 years, 1 month ago Viewed 250k times
arithmetic - Formal proof for $ (-1) \times (-1) = 1$ - Mathematics . . . Is there a formal proof for $(-1) \\times (-1) = 1$? It's a fundamental formula not only in arithmetic but also in the whole of math Is there a proof for it or is it just assumed?
1 8, 1 4, 1 2, 3 4,7 8英寸分别是多少厘米? - 知乎 把1英寸分成8等分: 1 8 1 4 3 8 1 2 5 8 3 4 7 8 英寸。 This is an arithmetic sequence since there is a common difference between each term In this case, adding 18 to the previous term in the sequence gives the next term In other words, an=a1+d (n−1) Arithmetic Sequence: d=1 8
Taylor series of $\ln (1+x)$? - Mathematics Stack Exchange Note that $$\frac {1} {1+x}=\sum_ {n \ge 0} (-1)^nx^n$$ Integrating both sides gives you \begin {align} \ln (1+x) =\sum_ {n \ge 0}\frac { (-1)^nx^ {n+1}} {n+1}\\ =x
为什么 1 不能被认为是质数? - 知乎 比如,用质数组合得到数字6的唯一方法是2×3(顺序不重要,所以3×2算是同一种方法)。 然而,如果我们说1也算质数的话,那么得到6的方法就还有1×2×3和1×1×2×3,等等。 1的存在会破坏一切,对我们完全没有帮助。 所以我们必须弥补这个规则中的漏洞。
What would base $1$ be? - Mathematics Stack Exchange The examples given with base 10 and 2 in the question are positional bases In a positional base 1, you only got one digit, with no value: 0 All positions will have zero value, and you can only represent one number: 0 – Bijective base 1 would be one way to make it funcitonal, but that isn't a positional base
limx→0, (1+x)^1 x=e 为什么? - 知乎 对于 (1+1 n)^n < 3的证明如下图 (图片来自 崔尚斌数学分析教程)